GAZI UNIVERSITY INFORMATION PACKAGE - 2019 ACADEMIC YEAR

COURSE DESCRIPTION
TEXT COMMENTARY AND TEXT MENDING II/5010044
Course Title: TEXT COMMENTARY AND TEXT MENDING II
Credits 3 ECTS 7.5
Semester 1 Compulsory/Elective Elective
COURSE INFO
 -- LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
  Turkish
 -- NAME OF LECTURER(S)
  Prof. Dr. Yaşar AYDEMİR
 -- WEB SITE(S) OF LECTURER(S)
  www.gazi.edu.tr/aydemir
 -- EMAIL(S) OF LECTURER(S)
  aydemir@gazi.edu.tr
 -- LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE COURSE UNIT
To know traditional methods of text analysis.
To know modern methods of text analysis.
To practice text mending.






 -- MODE OF DELIVERY
  The mode of delivery of this course is Face to face
 -- PREREQUISITES AND CO-REQUISITES
  There is no prerequisite or co-requisite for this course.
 -- RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
  There is no recommended optional programme component for this course.
 --COURSE CONTENT
1. Week  What is a text? Why is text mending made?
2. Week  In which situation is text mending made?
3. Week  Issues to be considered in verse mending
4. Week  Issues to be considered in verse mending
5. Week  Issues to be considered in verse mending
6. Week  Prose mending practise
7. Week  Prose mending practise
8. Week  Midterm Exam
9. Week  Prose mending practise
10. Week  Prose mending practise
11. Week  Prose mending practise
12. Week  Prose mending practise
13. Week  Prose mending practise
14. Week  Overall Assessment
15. Week  
16. Week  
 -- RECOMMENDED OR REQUIRED READING
  1. AKSOYAK, İsmail Hakkı; “Metin Şerhi”, Eski Türk Edebiyatı El Kitabı, Ankara, 2005. 2. ARSLAN, Hüsamettin; Epistemik Cemaat, Paradigma Yayınları, İstanbul, 1992. 3. AYNUR, Hatice; ÇAKIR, Müjgan; KURU, Selim; Eski Türk Edebiyatına Modern Yaklaşımlar-II, Turkuaz, İstanbul, 2008. 4. BİLGEGİL, Kaya; Edebiyat Bilgi ve Teorileri, Enderun Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1989. 5. ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Mehmet; Divanlar Arasında, Ankara,1981. 6. GENÇ, İlhan; “Klasik Türk Edebiyatı Metinlerini Anlamada Modern Yaklaşımlar”, Turkish Studies, Volume 2/4 Fall 2007. 7. KORTANTAMER Tunca; “Teori Zemininde Metin Şerhi Meselesi”, İlesam I. Eski Türk Edebiyatı Kolokyumu, Ankara 1992, 17-18 Ocak. 8. KURNAZ, Cemâl; Osmanlı Şair Okulu, Birleşik Kitabevi, Ankara 2008. 9. MENGİ, Mine; “Metin Şerhi, Tahlili ve Tenkidi Üzerine Düşünceler”, Dergâh, 93, 1997 s.129, 140. 10. ONAY, Ahmet Talat; Eski Türk Edebiyatında Mazmunlar ve İzahı,Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara, 2001.
 -- PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS
  Lecture, Question & Answer, Demonstration, Drill - Practise
 -- WORK PLACEMENT(S)
  None
 -- ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
 
Quantity
Percentage
 Mid-terms
1
40
 Assignment
0
0
 Exercises
0
0
 Projects
0
0
 Practice
0
0
 Quiz
0
0
 Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade  
40
 Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade  
60
 -- WORKLOAD
 Efficiency  Total Week Count  Weekly Duration (in hour)  Total Workload in Semester
 Theoretical Study Hours of Course Per Week
14
3
42
 Practising Hours of Course Per Week
0
 Reading
10
3
30
 Searching in Internet and Library
12
2
24
 Designing and Applying Materials
10
3
30
 Preparing Reports
0
 Preparing Presentation
0
 Presentation
0
 Mid-Term and Studying for Mid-Term
7
3
21
 Final and Studying for Final
12
3
36
 Other
0
 TOTAL WORKLOAD: 
183
 TOTAL WORKLOAD / 25: 
7.32
 ECTS: 
7.5
 -- COURSE'S CONTRIBUTION TO PROGRAM
NO
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES
1
2
3
4
5
1X
2X
3X
4X
5X
6X
7X
8X
9X
10X
11X
12X
13X
14X
15X
16X